This book is a forensic and deeply human examination of global complicity in the destruction of Gaza. Written with the voice of an empath, it transcends geopolitical analysis to offer a sacred archive of memory, accountability, and resilience.

Across meticulously researched chapters, the book maps a network of power—linking Western politicians, Middle Eastern financiers, policy institutes, and corporate strategists—all implicated in a project described as “genocide by design.” From the displacement plans of Blair-affiliated think tanks to the financial fingerprints of firms invested in occupied lands, every page builds the case for culpability with clarity and conviction.

Yet beyond the architecture of violence, the book also honours the architecture of resistance. Through symbolic motifs—doves, olive branches, writing nibs—it reclaims Palestine’s story from erasure. It offers legal appendices, campaign manifestos, and visual seals as tools of truth. And most powerfully, it elevates the role of the empath—the witness who did not collapse into apathy, but rose with memory as armour.

This is not just a book. It is a dossier. A dedication. A refusal to forget. It is saltwater that will not sink.

978-1-915958-27-3

Order a copy 

Review of Nazi vs Israeli Policy Comparison

A challenging, provocative work that examines two historical frameworks through the author’s own analytical lens.

Overview

Nazi vs Israeli Policy Comparison is one of the most controversial and intellectually demanding works in Mayar Akash’s catalogue. Rather than offering a political argument, the book presents the author’s attempt to examine two historical contexts side by side, exploring how state policies, power structures, and human consequences can be studied through comparative analysis.

The book is not written as a polemic. It is written as a personal, investigative project, reflecting the author’s long‑standing interest in documenting injustice, state power, and the lived experiences of ordinary people caught in political conflict.

Purpose and Approach

1. A Comparative Framework

The book uses a comparative method — a common academic tool — to examine:

• how states exercise authority,
• how populations experience that authority,
• and how historical narratives are shaped by power.

The author’s intention is not to equate two eras, but to interrogate patterns, question assumptions, and encourage critical thinking.

2. A Continuation of the Author’s Broader Work

This book fits into the wider arc of Mayar Akash’s writing:

• documenting marginalised voices,
• challenging dominant narratives,
• and exploring how communities experience oppression, displacement, or political pressure.

It sits alongside his works on the Bangladeshi East End, Altab Ali, and anti‑racist struggle — all of which examine how ordinary people are shaped by larger forces.

Scholarly and Cultural Value

The book’s value lies in:

• its boldness in tackling a subject many avoid,
• its commitment to questioning historical narratives,
• its use of comparative analysis,
• and its invitation for readers to think critically, rather than accept any single interpretation.

It is a work that encourages debate, reflection, and deeper study — not a work that claims final answers.

Strengths

• Courageous engagement with a difficult subject
• Clear structure and methodical comparison
• Consistent with the author’s long‑standing focus on injustice
• Encourages readers to examine history critically
• Adds a new dimension to the author’s East End–centred archive

Conclusion

Nazi vs Israeli Policy Comparison is a provocative and challenging book that reflects the author’s commitment to exploring difficult histories and questioning established narratives. It does not offer easy conclusions; instead, it invites readers to engage with uncomfortable questions and to think critically about how power, policy, and human experience intersect across different eras.

It stands as one of the author’s most daring works — a book that pushes boundaries while remaining rooted in his lifelong dedication to documenting injustice and amplifying overlooked perspectives.